Peter Navarro, a former adviser to President Donald Trump, has been found guilty of contempt of Congress for his refusal to cooperate with an investigation into alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Navarro’s Contempt of Congress
Prosecutors claimed that Navarro disregarded the law by ignoring a congressional subpoena. He’s now facing the possibility of up to a year in prison for each of the two contempt charges on top of fines. The situation isn’t entirely unprecedented as Steve Bannon, another prominent Trump ally, had previously been convicted of contempt of Congress in a similar case.
Peter Navarro’s Response
Navarro expressed his disappointment outside the Washington DC court, calling it a “sad day for America.” He vowed to pursue an appeal that could potentially reach the Supreme Court and argued that it was unprecedented in the nation’s history for a senior White House adviser to be charged with such a crime.
Peter Navarro’s Words
“This is the first time in the history of our republic that a senior White House adviser, an alter ego of the president, has ever been charged with this alleged crime,” Navarro said, going on to claim that the Department of Justice had a longstanding policy of not compelling senior White House advisers to testify before Congress, despite the case brought against him.
Alleged Juror Misconduct
A 12-member jury found Navarro guilty after four hours of deliberations following a short, two-day trial. His legal team is now seeking a mistrial and claims that jurors interacted with protestors outside the court before a conclusion had been reached.
Election Certification Efforts
Navarro’s legal problems started when he was served with a subpoena by a select committee of the US House of Representatives. The committee in question, which was led by Democrats, aimed to question Navarro about his involvement in efforts to delay the certification of the 2020 presidential election results.
The Green Bay Sweep
In Navarro’s book – “In Trump Time” – he claimed to be the architect of a strategy to challenge the election results, citing widespread voter fraud and proposing a plan for congressional Republicans to delay President Joe Biden’s victory. He referred to this strategy as the “Green Bay Sweep.”
Controversial Claims and Indictment
The House committee contended that Navarro’s claims of extensive ballot fraud had been debunked by state and local officials. Navarro was indicted in June of the following year and arrested by FBI agents at a Washington airport as he was boarding a flight to Nashville, Tennessee.
The Prosecution’s Argument
During the trial’s closing arguments, prosecutors emphasized that Navarro had chosen loyalty to President Trump over complying with the congressional subpoena, labeling this as contempt of Congress and a criminal act. Stanley Woodward, Navarro’s lawyer, presented minimal evidence during the trial, focusing instead on discrediting the prosecution.
Navarro’s Executive Privilege
When initially contacted by the committee, Navarro had cited executive privilege, a legal principle that can shield certain White House communications from disclosure. However, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that there was no evidence to support Navarro’s claim of executive privilege as a justification for ignoring the committee’s summons.
Political Motivation and Implications
Some observers, including former Trump campaign adviser Bryan Lanza, have suggested that these prosecutions appear politically motivated. Lanza noted that while it’s not uncommon for Congress to hold former or current presidential administration members in contempt, it is unusual for the Department of Justice to pursue criminal prosecutions in such cases.
A Previous Example
Lanza cited the example of former US Attorney General Eric Holder who, under President Barack Obama’s administration, was held in contempt by a Republican-controlled Congress in 2012 but was not criminally prosecuted. Lanza expressed concern that escalating these situations could be detrimental to the country’s system of government.
Bannon’s Similar Conviction
It’s worth mentioning that Steve Bannon, a former Trump campaign strategist, faced two counts of contempt for defying a House committee’s legal summons in July 2022. Bannon received a four-month jail sentence but has remained free while his defense team appeals his conviction.
The Internet’s Response
News of Navarro’s conviction was shared across social media and everyone had an opinion to voice. “Fun fact you should know! Part of Navarro’s defense was that he didn’t go to his hearing on the date requested because the subpoena did not include a room number,” one person said.
A Law-Abiding History
Others discussed the stupidity of Navarro’s actions, unable to believe someone would throw away their law-abiding record for someone like Donald Trump. One person said: “Imagine spending your entire life following the law, only to throw it away in your retirement age for Trump. For Trump.”
Navarro and Bannon
Some people discussed Bannon and expressed concern about the fact that he’s yet to spend any time in jail. “Convicted of the same thing as Bannon, who hasn’t spent a minute in jail,” one person said. “Bannon was convicted ages ago and he’s yet to serve his punishment so I’m not holding out hope,” another wrote.
His Sentence Will Be Minimal
A fair few commenters echoed the aforementioned individuals. One person said: “Not to be negative but given that Bannon has yet to see the inside of a jail cell, I’m not overly excited by this news. He’ll appeal for years and his sentence will be minimal, if not overturned or pardoned.”
An Open and Shut Trial
Another person said: “Jury selection for this case was [really recent], that’s how open and shut this trial was. The guy didn’t even put up a defense. He either knows something the rest of us don’t, like the world is ending before January, or he is incredibly dumb.”
A Right-Wing Martyr
Others said Navarro would be pleased with the result. “It’s a win for him. Maybe he gets sentenced to some months in a white collar prison and pays $100,000 to $200,000 in fines. Then he goes on the right-wing circuit and plays martyr and raises a few million,” one person wrote.
“This Means That the POTUS Can Lie 24/7”: Judge Rules That Trump’s False Election Claims While in Office Are Covered by Presidential Immunity
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Michael Erdos has ruled that Trump was protected by presidential immunity when he made false election claims, effectively shielding him from the consequences of his words while in office.
“Donald Really Thinks He’s God’s Gift”: Trump Throws Son Under the Bus and Claims He Was Too Busy “Saving Millions of Lives” to Commit Fraud
Donald Trump has claimed that his duties in “saving millions of lives” from a potential nuclear holocaust during his presidency left him too preoccupied to actively run his business empire. This was an attempt to defend himself against fraud charges.
21 Things Forbidden by the Bible (But You Might Already Be Doing Them!)
As we navigate the present day, it’s fascinating to discover age-old Biblical rules that might feel out of place today. From clean-shaven debates to the great pork dilemma, let’s dive into these intriguing prohibitions. Hold onto your hats because some of these are real eyebrow-raisers!
“Jesus Was a Socialist”: Christianity in Crisis as Conservatives Finally Realize Jesus Was Woke
Russell Moore, once a prominent figure within the Southern Baptist Convention, has expressed profound concerns regarding the current trajectory of Christianity within the United States.
Empty Pews, Changing Views: 18 Reasons Why Modern Congregations Are Thinning Out
Sit tight, friends! Have you noticed that your usual church-going squad is thinning out? Even the little old ladies with their prayer books seem to have made themselves scarce. But what’s causing this great church exodus? Let’s pull back the curtain and examine why some people are swapping the sermon for a Sunday sleep-in with our intriguing list of 18 reasons.